Re: Length vs width vs height
I've noticed my discus tend to occupy all levels of the tank, but they do seem to congregate near the surface - probably due to food.
Length vs width vs height
Re: Length vs width vs height
Re: Length vs width vs height
Thanks mervin. I can slightly upgrade my 4x2x2 foot tank to a 6ftx 18 inchx29inch tank. Don’t love the height or decreased width. What are your thoughts D’bunk
I'd rather they did a 180, know what I mean. A 6 x 24in X24in tank, now that's my sweet spot.
Thanks mervin. I can slightly upgrade my 4x2x2 foot tank to a 6ftx 18 inchx29inch tank. Don’t love the height or decreased width. What are your thoughts D’bunk
I'd rather they did a 180, know what I mean. A 6 x 24in X24in tank, now that's my sweet spot.
Re: Length vs width vs height
Re: Length vs width vs height
That sounds ideal to me, Pat. A 6 x 24in x 24in tank would be perfect.
That sounds ideal to me, Pat. A 6 x 24in x 24in tank would be perfect.
Re: Length vs width vs height
Re: Length vs width vs height
A loooong tank is definitely on my to-do list for someday. I've been thinking about the math behind it, and it's pretty wild how a slight reduction in height and width can translate to a significant increase in length. For example, if I were to shave 6 inches off the height and 2 inches off the width of my current 150-gallon tank, I could add nearly 3 more feet to the length and still maintain the same volume of water.
A tank with dimensions of 108" x 24" x 16" would be around 160 gallons, which is an interesting prospect. But if I'm being completely honest, my dream tank would be more along the lines of 120" x 28" x 15", which would put it at around 200 gallons. Of course, a tank of that size would likely require a custom build using plywood with a single glass side.
The catch is that I'm not sure when I'll have the time to gain the necessary experience to tackle a project of that scope, especially if I want to build it inside my house. For now, I'm exploring alternative options, like setting up a raised discus pond in my detached garage – no joke.
A loooong tank is definitely on my to-do list for someday. I've been thinking about the math behind it, and it's pretty wild how a slight reduction in height and width can translate to a significant increase in length. For example, if I were to shave 6 inches off the height and 2 inches off the width of my current 150-gallon tank, I could add nearly 3 more feet to the length and still maintain the same volume of water.
A tank with dimensions of 108" x 24" x 16" would be around 160 gallons, which is an interesting prospect. But if I'm being completely honest, my dream tank would be more along the lines of 120" x 28" x 15", which would put it at around 200 gallons. Of course, a tank of that size would likely require a custom build using plywood with a single glass side.
The catch is that I'm not sure when I'll have the time to gain the necessary experience to tackle a project of that scope, especially if I want to build it inside my house. For now, I'm exploring alternative options, like setting up a raised discus pond in my detached garage – no joke.
Re: Length vs width vs height
Re: Length vs width vs height
Thanks for the insight D'bunk. I'm curious about the sources you've used to form your opinions on tank size. Pat - I also appreciate a 72" x 30" x 18" setup, roughly 200 gallons. To be honest, I'm not thrilled about the prospect of plumbing a sump and other equipment. I've gained a new appreciation for the depth of my current tank. Has anyone had experience with an external overflow bean system?
Thanks for the insight D'bunk. I'm curious about the sources you've used to form your opinions on tank size. Pat - I also appreciate a 72" x 30" x 18" setup, roughly 200 gallons. To be honest, I'm not thrilled about the prospect of plumbing a sump and other equipment. I've gained a new appreciation for the depth of my current tank. Has anyone had experience with an external overflow bean system?
PHPBB-BG.INFO